Assessment Description
Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal clubs, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.
You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.
Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. Use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 9.3, 10.2, 10.3
Author: admin
-
Scholarly Activity Summary: Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration through Quality Improvement Initiatives
-
Nurse Advocacy: Using our Voices for Positive Change My advocacy topic for this discussion is the importance of mental health awareness and access to resources for healthcare professionals. As nurses, we often prioritize the well-being of our patients and neglect our own mental
Discussion Topic: Action Item Module 5 Discussion III: Nurse AdvocacyAction Item Module 5 Discussion III: Nurse Advocacy
Initial Post due 7/18/24
Cross Posts due 7/22/24 including responses to peer post
Advocacy Discussion
In this module the focus is on the role of advocacy of nurse leaders. Use your voice to communicate the content of this assignment. Discussion is encouraged.
The purpose of this assignment is to develop your strength as a leader in advocating for important topics impacting health care. You will also develop effective presentation skills.
For the discussion:
Select the topic of your advocacy discussion early in the semester. See the Action Item link to the Advocacy Topic selection spreadsheet in the Week One Activities module.
Research the topic you have selected to assure you have evidence to support the discussion.
Watch the Tutorial Videos for this Module.
Develop a power point presentation based on the required readings for effective power point presentations. Be sure to use the rubric to develop the presentation.
You must record a narrative for the power point presentation using Panopto. Please do not attempt to record the power point presentation in power point and plan to bypass Panopto, the recorded power point file will not effectively upload. The presentation must be recorded in Panopto. If you have difficulty recording the presentation, please email your primary faculty for assistance. Use the tutorials as a guide. Hint: Many of the challenges with recording usually involve using a Mac, If you have access to a system that uses Windows, you may have an easier time completing the recording. We have found that if you do choose to record on the web with the Mac, that significantly reduces the problems students have encountered in the past.
Reminder: the rubric will be found at the three dots located at the top of the discussion assignment.
There is a 10 slide limit excluding a cover slide and a reference slide. Include a reference slide with the presentation.
You will Use a Reply post to these instructions to post your recorded presentation.
See the tutorial video for how to record using Panopto. The initial post recording should not exceed 10 minutes.
Prepare the Reply post with the title on the first line: Last name First name Initial Post Advocacy Discussion
After you type the first line, enter several blank lines to place the move the cursor down the page and then go the plug shaped icon at the top right of the reply box.
From the list in the drop down box, select Panopto Video.
There are three tabs in the Panopto video, select Choose to insert your recorded presentation.
Review 4 peer presentations and complete cross posts for a minimum of two presentations. Cross posts must be recorded narratives. Cross posts should not exceed 3 minutes. There is not a time limit on responses to peer cross posts.
Respectful discourse is encouraged.
Discussions: Discussions will not be edited or deleted after submission. If revisions are needed, the revised submission may be submitted as a reply to the original submission with a heading noting the resubmission of the content. If significant time has elapsed from the original submission, greater than five minutes, the original submission will be the work graded and the resubmission will not be evaluated for grading. -
Title: Choosing a Nursing Specialty in Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Professional Affiliations As a nursing student, choosing a specialty can be a daunting task. There are various nursing specialties to choose from, each with its unique opportunities
an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member.( as an NP psychiatric) -
Title: Exploring Communication Styles in the Workplace and Analyzing a Successful Communication Event A. The most interesting communication event that I observed at work was a team meeting where a new project was being discussed and planned. The project manager, who typically
A. Now that you have experienced observing communications styles at work, tell us about the most interesting communications event you charted:
Why was this event so interesting based on what you learned about in class so far?
Applying the principles and concepts of communications styles theory and Shannon-Weaver, how successful was the communication process employed in the event? Why was it successful? Or Why wasn’t it successful?
B. From the Business Writing Process Scenario for Healthcare Worksheet (Located within Module 2), post by Sunday your favorite of the three scenarios you wrote. Read your classmates’ posts and comment on one about what you see as a good practice of the writing process or effective use of language. -
“Strengthening Organizations and Programs Through Risk Management: A Discussion on the Benefits of Aggregating Risks and the Impact on Enterprises”
Important: Please reaspond the the two students’s discussion posts down below. It will be marked as response 1 and response 2, please do one response for each. Make sure you relate to what they are saying and keep the conversation going. Keep it somewhat casual but still academic.
No plagiarism, please upload a plagiarism report.
RESPONSE 1: About 135 words
When it comes to an organization being stronger together instead of the constituents acting independently, it’s great to consider the amount of strength that comes with a united front. Using the same perspective when it comes to project risks remains true as well. When it comes to a program having independent risks, it’s easier to mitigate those smaller fires by having staff that can help before letting it grow into something more devastating. Smaller project risks could cause a domino effect, becoming so critical that it can stop a program altogether. An enterprise generally outlast projects because of the structures and systems they have in place. In an enterprise, they would likely have a robust risk management framework that is incredibly successful in mitigating risks across programs and projects.
RESPONSE 2: About 135 words
Discussion #1: The whole is often greater than the sum of the parts. What are some considerations when aggregating “project” risks to the “program” level?
Many projects can increase the risk on the program level. For example, in a construction program, the jobs of the painter, drywall hanger, concrete mixer, electrician, etc., combine to make the mass, the whole, or the sum that works under the general contractor. Aggregating is like having all the funds in one account. In other words, all the skilled workers are under one project. However, if one of the jobs is not completed, it could cause some risk to the program level. These are some of the considerations when aggregating project risk to program level. It could cause late deliveries of goods, extra costs over budget, improper permits, lack of skilled workers, or material costs.
Discussion #2: Enterprises generally outlast projects, programs, and portfolios. How do you see this impacting the approach that an enterprise must take to risk identification and management?
I do not understand the second question. Since I don’t want to butcher the answer, I will limit the conversation to what I think.
Enterprises, identification, and management risk consist of minimizing the cost of finances, legal contracts, and/or nondisclosure terms to any organization or business. -
Title: Analyzing Print Awareness and Letter Knowledge in Young Children through Observation and Evidence
READ the chapters listed below before starting this assignment:CORE Chapter 3-Print Awareness
CORE Chapter 4-Letter Knowledge
OBSERVE the following content:3-years old child reading a book – Video
4-years old child creating a drawing/letter – Video
4-years old child – drawing #1
4-years old child – drawing #2
ANALYZE While observing the videos and drawings:List the behaviors you can recognize that are consistent with Print Awareness and/or Letter Knowledge, and Explain how the evidence relates to Print Awareness and/or letter Knowledge.
WRITE your analysis and submitDiscuss the above in your write-up (the listed items and the explanations)
Include specific references to what the children are doing and saying.
http://www.corelearn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/sourcebook-3rd-edition-sampler.pdf -
“Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations: Best Practices and Strategies for Convincing the Board”
Initial Post Instructions
This week you learned how to create professional presentations. It is not only important to know how to use all of the features in PowerPoint, but also when it is appropriate or not to apply certain options. Let’s start talking about what you consider to be best practices when creating a PowerPoint presentation. Also, describe which features you considered the most helpful versus those that could be distracting or challenging to use. Finally, share how you are planning to convince the board to approve your research funding( see attached presentation) Share how you setup your presentation to convince them.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer(see link).
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2363221/uiconf_id/43522921/entry_id/1_c76vdipu/embed/dynamic
Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. This is a hands-on course and it is expected for you to use more visuals such as screenshots and video. Make sure to utilize that since it is a requirement. -
Assessing the Effect of a Health Problem on Quality of Care, Patient Safety, and Costs in a Clinical Setting.
In this assessment, you’ll assess the effect of the health problem you’ve defined on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual. Plan to spend at least 2 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts.
To prepare for the assessment:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.
Conduct research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your assessment and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.
Review the Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 2 [PDF] Download Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 2 [PDF], which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.
Complete this assessment in two parts.
Part 1
Assess the effect of the patient, family, or population problem you defined in the previous assessment on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 2 [PDF] Download Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 2 [PDF]provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions.
Part 2
Report on your experiences during your first 2 practicum hours, including how you presented your ideas about the health problem to the patient, family, or group.
Whom did you meet with?
What did you learn from them?
Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites you reviewed.
What did you learn from that review?
Share the process and experience of exploring the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.
What barriers, if any, did you encounter when presenting the problem to the patient, family, or group?
Did the patient, family, or group agree with you about the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance?
What leadership, communication, collaboration, or change management skills did you employ during your interactions to overcome these barriers or change the patient’s, family’s, or group’s thinking about the problem (for example, creating a sense of urgency based on data or policy requirements)?
What changes, if any, did you make to your definition of the problem, based on your discussions?
What might you have done differently? -
The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Health Outcomes: An Evaluation and Recommendations for Public Health and Healthcare Professionals Abstract This paper examines the statement from the World Health Organization (WHO) that factors such as where we live, the state
To a large extent, factors such as where we live, the state of our environment, genetics, our income and education level, and our relationships with friends and family all have considerable impacts on health, whereas the more commonly considered factors such as access and use of healthcare services often have less of an impact” (World Health Organization, 2015). (40 points) Due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time).
Reflect on the above statement from the WHO and consider the effect of Social Determinants of Health on individuals and populations.
Evaluate the social determinants (social, political, cultural, etc.) that influence the health of individuals and populations.
Evaluate the effect of social determinants of health on health outcomes of specific populations
Explore the systemic roots of SDOH and how CBPR (community based participatory research) can help identify and address these factors.
Provide evidence-based recommendations, that can be employed by public health and healthcare professionals, in order to improve the equity in health outcomes relevant to SDOH.
Submit a 4-5 page paper (excluding cover page, abstract, and references) and provide at least five (5) scholarly references to support your assessment. Apply APA format for all your formatting, citations, and references, unless otherwise indicated.
All papers should be double spaced, and follow APA format. Each paper must have:
Title page;
Abstract;
Use of Level I and II headings (if applicable);
In-text citations;
References page
Please use the sample APA paper template (with instructions) (provided below) for all paper assignments: -
Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Organizational Improvement: An Interview and Issue Identification Report Interdisciplinary Problem-Solving: Interview and Issue Identification
THIS IS ONE OF A 3 PART ASSIGNMENT IF ACCEPTING THIS ASSIGNMENT PLEASE ACCEPT THE OTHER 2 ASSIGNMENTS!
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Reference
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], Download Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
Please use interview template attached
This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.
For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] Download Interview Guide [DOCX]for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.