Peer responses must be of sufficient length to address the discussion prompt sufficiently and sufficient substance to be meaningful (a good guide is for it to be around 100-150 words), substantive (i.e., address the content of the post and the lesson material), and grounded in the lesson material and literature. A good way to address this requirement is to make direct reference to at least one of the assigned readings and/or the lesson material in each of your required peer responses. You may challenge, support, or supplement another student’s answer using the terms, concepts, and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate, as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level.
Answer 1: self-explanatory
Answer 2: self-explanatory
When writing your response, please include in the text of each answer:
– one question
– a new fact and/or a new perspective
– use one source and cite the source at the end
– information that would support a further conversation
– address the post
Write all answers in the same document and mark them as Answer 1, Answer 2 (separately).
Author: admin
-
Peer Responses to Discussion Prompt: “The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Opinion”
-
“Local vs Federal Law Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis”
Compare and contrast essay on local law enforcement vs federal law enforcement. A compare and contrast essay can be written to compare two similar events or two situations. It can also compare two authors writing on the same subject, or two places of tourist interest. However, some common meeting ground for both is necessary. For example, writing a comparative analysis on the performance of two football teams has the common factor as a game of football itself, which will be the basis to highlight the comparison between the teams.
-
Title: “The Impact of Climate Change on Global Sea Levels: A Critical Analysis and Projection”
Do a report and PowerPoint presentation carefully and critically for the questions attached. Please no Ai and up to date informations. Also add the calculations used in it.
-
“Comprehensive Assessment and Evidence-Based Treatment Plan for a Patient with a Mental Health Disorder”
Subjective Data:
The Chief Complaint is clear, concise, and verbatim from pt. History of Present Illness is thorough yet concise and provides a chronological account of symptoms and contextual factors that are sufficiently descriptive (OLDCARTS) to validate Dx per DSM-5 TR criteria. All pertinent negatives are included. A longitudinal course of illness is clear. Current psychiatric medications and responses are included.
Objective Data:
MSE contains the required elements. It is in narrative form and effectively and vividly describes the patient’s presentation. Concrete examples of all assessment results are included i.e. “able to correctly interpret 2/3 simple proverbs” to validate documentation of “abstract thought intact.”
Assessment:
The differential is pertinent to signs and symptoms, the formulation contains evidence of critical thought and subject knowledge, and reasonable diagnoses are made per DSM-5. Clearly met criteria for diagnoses tendered are explicit in the HPI (History of Present Illness) description and substantiated with the MSE.
Plan:
An evidence-based treatment plan is presented with detailed rationales. The level of detail reflects the student’s ability to choose treatments based not only on FDA approval or current evidence but also on the nuances and unique characteristics of each. The treatment plan is holistic and comprehensive. There is compelling evidence of the student’s synthesis of information and critical thought. Includes neurobiology information on the disorder.
Writing, Support, APA:
The format is consistent with the example provided in the course. Clear, recent (5-7 years), scholarly, peer-reviewed support of topics. Minimal grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing mechanics include minimal awkward or unclear passages but are consistent with formal scholarly work.
The writer has freedom to make up a mental health diagnosis and patient -
Title: Implementation and Evaluation Plan for an Evidence-Based Intervention Proposal
The final capstone project is a series of written research-based assignments completed throughout this course that culminate in a final evidenced-Based Proposal paper and presentation. Students are encouraged to share their completed proposals with a health care organization that could benefit from the proposal. For this fourth assignment, you will present the proposed solution for your evidence-based intervention and outline the implementation and evaluation plan.
Proposal
In 100-250 words, present a detailed explanation of your proposed solution (new policy, process, procedure, or education that addresses the problem or issue you identified for your project). Include rationale for why you selected proposed solution. The proposed solution should be based on the support indicated in the literature review.
Preparing an Implementation Plan
Develop an implementation plan (500-750 words). The elements that should be included in your plan are listed below:
Strategies for obtaining necessary approval(s) and securing support from your organization’s leadership and fellow staff. If you are proposing a change in current policy, process, or procedure, first describe the current policy, process, or procedure as a baseline for comparison.
Description of implementation. (When and how will the change be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow? Who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the implementation process?)
Resources required for implementation: stakeholders; assessment tools (questionnaires, surveys, pretests and posttests to assess knowledge of participants at baseline and after intervention); technology (technological or software needs); funds (cost of educating staff, printing or producing educational materials, gathering and analyzing data before, during, and following implementation); and staff to initiate, oversee, and evaluate change.
Evaluation Plan
Prepare an evaluation plan (500-750 words) supported by your critical analysis of the literature.
Discuss methods to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution.
Describe what your projected outcomes will be and what variables will be assessed.
General Requirements
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.
Please use the documents attached as a reference!! -
“Defending Against Russia: The DoD’s Priorities and Strategies for National Defense”
. Your class’s themes is: Russia. Utilizing your mission primer as a starting point, your team will conduct research to answer the below questions your presentation : 1. Cyberspace->
Describe 4-5 (four to 5) defense priority used by the DoD to ensure support of the National Defense Strategy based on Russia’s region? What factors or ideas show Russia uses the instruments of national power? 2. National Defense Strategy
Describe (5-6) defense priority used by the DoD to ensure support of the National Defense Strategy based on Russia ? What factors or ideas show how your Region uses the instruments of national power?
Yiu can also add how the DOD supports Ukraine against Russia . Add pie /bar charts if necessary, statistics if necessary. I need like 2-4 sources Visual aid is a must -
Examining Elections, Voting, Campaigns, and Political Parties: Reflection and Analysis 1. A. Elections, Voting and Campaigns The most important aspect of this topic that stood out to me was the impact of media on elections and campaigns
n your entries you are asked to write about what you are learning as a result of the assigned materials for four parts of the course that correspond to the four exams. You should have at least three paragraphs that address items 1-3 below. Mark each response with corresponding numeral 1-3. Item 4 is my overall evaluation of your writing. Each item’s total weight is 5 points with a total of 20 points for the entry.
Describe and analyze what you thought was most important about what was covered in the readings from each topic. In this journal entry you will need to discuss one thing from . Please use the following format:
A. Elections, Voting and CampaignsContext Module Sub HeadeElections, Voting & Campaigns
B. Political Parties
2. Identify ideas/concepts/perspectives etc., that you found to be interesting or challenging.
A. Elections, Voting and CampaignsContext Module Sub HeadeElections, Voting & Campaigns
B. Political Parties
3. Assess how you are doing in understanding the materials overall. Feel free to address things that you are not clear about and I will
respond. Please ensure clarity, detail, and depth of response so that it adheres to academic writing and follow the above instructions instructions.
DO NOT SUMMARIZE the materials you have read. You are to react to the materials (PowerPoints files, videos, website articles, etc.). This assignment is about reflection and analysis, not regurgitation of the course materials. I will deduct half of the points if a response is a summary. -
Title: “Inside the Game: A Comprehensive Look at the Dallas Cowboys Organization”
An industry presentation (8-10 min. long) on a sport organization of your choice (e.g. NIKE, ESPN, Dallas Cowboys, Dallas Mavericks, etc.). You will create a presentation to be presented during class time and develop a concise but detailed 10-12 page (double spaced 12 pt font) report of their findings. Title page and reference page are not included in those 10-12 pages. The report does not have to be an essay. Your report can include subheadings, pictures/graphs interwoven through the writing, and some sections might be partly in bullet-point form. The assignment includes questions such as purpose and mission of the organization, its background, its stakeholders, the job types in the organization etc. Some things to consider for this assignment:
Mission of the organization
Organizational background
Organizational chart and leadership team
Organizational stakeholders (fans/consumer)
Organizational marketing efforts
Organizational sport sponsorship efforts
What is the financial situation of the organization? Where do they get their revenue from? What are their expenses?
Sociological impact: what are some external forces from outside the organization that are impacting them?
The job types in the organization
Internship opportunities
List at least five (5) research references at the end of your written summary -
“Family Support and Housing Assessment: Identifying Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions” Pre-Brief: 1. What is the purpose of conducting a family support and housing assessment? The purpose of conducting a family support and housing assessment is to gather
Everything highlighted in yellow needs to be done from document attached includes:
1. 2 questions pre-brief needs to be answered
2. 7 part assigment instructions
(I have already completed most of the assignment filling out the family support assessment and the apartment assessment part. Just missing the nursing diagnosis part)
website: portal.sentinelu.com
email: *****************************
password: Chrisg2295 -
“Analyzing and Incorporating New Research: A Critical Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles in [Topic Area]”
Review the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric, which is located in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course. It contains all requirements and detailed instructions for this paper.
Helpful hint for additional information: Watch the five-minute Milestone Three video.
2) Locate a new article from a peer-reviewed journal. The new article must be in the same topic area as the three articles used in Milestones One and Two.
Helpful hints to locate articles:
Use the Shapiro Library website.
Use Google Scholar.
3) Read your new article at least twice