Review the 3P Exam Summary Report.
Expand all categories by clicking “Expand All” to see all categories under the topic areas.
Create a Word Document with headings that correlate with the missed Knowledge Area, Question Topic, and Domain on the Pre-Predictor Exam Summary Report.
Use resources such as your textbook, or a reputable standard of care website, such as the American College of Cardiology, etc. to remediate. Summarize the missed content topic in 2-3 paragraphs and include a hyperlink to the reference.
All missed questions must be addressed to earn all points.
Remediation should begin as soon as possible.
Author: admin
-
Remediation for Missed Topics on 3P Exam Summary Report Introduction: The 3P Exam Summary Report is an important tool for students to assess their knowledge and identify areas of weakness in preparation for the 3P exam. It
-
“Expanding Your Research: Utilizing Surveys to Enhance Your Writing”
I have 57 pages written. Just need to continue on it. I’ll provide 100 surveys. You help me write the rest
-
Title: Legal and Ethical Analysis of a Healthcare Administration Case: Balancing Autonomy, Beneficence, and Professional Responsibility
Summary:
• Provide a concise summary of the case, outlining the key events, parties involved, and the central legal and ethical issues at hand.
Legal Description:
• Include a detailed legal analysis, incorporating relevant laws and legal precedents. Write the law in its legal citation format. For example, if discussing a statute, include its full citation (e.g., Title, Section, and Act number).
Application of Ethical Principles:
• Apply the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice to the case. Discuss how each principle is relevant and how it impacts the decisions or actions taken.
Professional Issues/Conflicts:
• Identify any professional issues or conflicts present in the case. This could include conflicts of interest, breaches of professional conduct, or ethical dilemmas faced by individuals or organizations involved.
Impact on Organization and Stakeholders:
• Analyze the case’s impact on the organization as a whole, as well as its medical staff and patients. Consider both short-term and long-term consequences, including reputational, financial, and legal implications.
Proposed Solution:
• Offer at least one solution or course of action to address the issues raised by the case. Please explain why this solution is appropriate and how it aligns with legal requirements and ethical principles.
Remember to support your analysis with evidence from the case and relevant literature, and ensure clarity and coherence in your presentation. This analysis will help deepen your understanding of legal and ethical complexities in healthcare administration and prepare you for real-world challenges in the field. -
Title: The Power of Intuition and Emotional Intelligence: Reflection on “InnSaei” Documentary The documentary “InnSaei- The Power of Intuition” is a thought-provoking and eye-opening exploration of the
Please answer these questions ( optional) below after watching the documentary “ InnSaei- The Power of Intuition.” This documentary is very helpful in understanding states of consciousness and how powerful our mind is! Also from 51mins, they discuss the importance of Emotional Intelligence/Regulation Education for children!
Link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GrHTnmrDDEV_4MBdCNFUrmPZUG_ztzCN/view?usp=drive_linkLinks to an external site.
How did the documentary affect you?
What parts of the documentary caught your attention and why?
Did the documentary change your mind about something? If so, explain how.
Did the documentary leave you with any questions?
( You do not have to answer all of these questions. These are just examples of questions you can use to write a reflection on the documentary)
Please write at least two pages (double-spaced) -
“The Great Debate: Is Mass Marketing Dead or Still Relevant?”
Instructions:
Initial posts are due on Thursday’s before midnight. This is to allow time for you and your peers to read and comment on your posts in a “discussion” style forum.
With marketers increasingly adopting more and more refined market segmentation schemes – fueled by the Internet and other customization efforts – some claim mass marketing is dead. Others counter there will always be room for large brands employing marketing programs to target the mass market.
Take a position: Mass marketing is dead versus mass marketing is still a viable way to build a profitable brand.
Please review the grading rubric to understand how you will be evaluated.
The rubric outlines the quantity, quality and frequency of posts/replies expected for effective participation.
The first posting should always be your original contribution to the forum and the postings thereafter should be interactions with your classmates aimed to enrich the online discussion.
Ideally postings should be spread out during the week to better synthesize other perspectives, demonstrate listening, and contribute to an evolving discussion -
Title: “Developing Metacognitive Abilities: Effective Learning and Study Strategies” Introduction: Metacognition refers to the ability to think about one’s own thinking and to be aware of one’s own cognitive processes. It is an essential skill
After reading Chapter 9 (pages 138-179) on Complex Cognitive Processes, respond to this prompt:
– Describe several learning and study strategies that help students develop their metacognitive abilities. -
“Exploring the Challenges and Complexities of Defining Religion and Studying it Through Different Approaches”
A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Explain, in your own words, two reasons why religion is difficult to define. Review the lessons in Unit 1 as you consider your response. Then, select one method for studying religion that you believe to be most thought-provoking and explain what you believe to be its strengths and weaknesses. Your short essay should include four parts: Explain, in your own words, two reasons why religion is difficult to define. Select one method for studying religion that you believe to be most thought-provoking, and summarize the approach in your own words. Explain a strength of this approach to studying religion. Explain a weakness of this approach to studying religion. The methods for studying religion discussed in Unit 1 include: Phenomenology Theology Historical Approaches Comparative Religion Philosophy of Religion Sociology of Religion As you develop your reflection, be sure to engage with the course material from Unit 1. You will use information from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the tutorial and use the following format (using Sophia’s Indigenous Religions tutorial as an example): In-text citation: (Religion and Food, n.d.) Reference: Sophia Learning (n.d.). Religion and Food [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. https://app.sophia.org/course_preview/approaches-to-studying-religions-3/challenge-1-1/9/8235/religion-and-food-2 This is only an example; your own citations will be for the tutorials you use in answering the question. Please do not use any sources outside the class. Refer to the completion checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. ❒ Have you explained two reasons why religion is difficult to define, in your own words? ❒ Have you selected a method for studying religion from Unit 1 and summarized the approach? ❒ Have you explained a strength and a weakness of this approach to studying religion? ❒ Does your short essay demonstrate engagement with the course material from Unit 1? ❒ Is your short essay between 400–600 words, double-spaced, and formatted in 12-point font? ❒ Have you cited examples with in-text citations? ❒ Are the cited examples from the class tutorials? USE ONLY THE PROVIDED UNIT TUTORIAL ❒ Have you proofread your short essay for mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization? C. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Composition must be between 400–600 words. Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Composition must be original and written for this assignment. Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited. Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. Include all of the assignment components in a single file. Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx. In-text citations should use this style: (Religion and Food, n.d.) References should use this style: Sophia Learning (n.d.). Religion and Food [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. https://app.sophia.org/course_preview/approaches-to-studying-religions-3/challenge-1-1/9/8235/religion-and-food-2 All cited examples are from the class tutorials.
-
Title: Ethical Issues in Psychological Research: Impact on Conduct and Practices
What ethical issues have arisen in psychological research, and how have these cases changed the way research is conducted? Please explain each in four sentences.
THIS PAPER DOES NOT NEED TO BE 550 WORDS I ONLY NEED 4 sentences. -
Title: “Reflections on Juvenile Corrections: Challenges and Opportunities for Reform”
juvinile corrections reflection paper
3 academic sources
2 full pages double spaced
in-text citations -
“Utilizing Criminal Profiling and Behavioral Analysis for Crime Prevention: Navigating Ethical Considerations” “Evaluating Scholarly Sources and Formatting in APA Style”
TOPIC – UTILIZING CRIMINAL PROFILING AND BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS FOR CRIME PREVENTION ,
WHILE NAVIGATING ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Review and choose a subject of interest from the text and/or assigned articles for a 10-12 page research paper. The paper is due on/by Sunday of week 7. In your response to the discussion “Research Paper Topic”, post the intended the subject you wish to research and why it is of special interest to you. I will approve, comment, or disapprove. This should be completed by the end of Week 2.
I want you to discuss a selected topic on criminal profiling. Support your review of this topic by providing examples and using the literature to support your presentation. Your opinion does not determine your grade. Your grade is determined by how well you support your argument utilizing the materials discussed in this course and the research material you locate. What I do not want is a regurgitation of the course materials. Expand on the materials, do not repeat them. Document your facts utilizing standard APA style. The paper is to be in APA format and the body of the paper is to be between 10 and 12 pages. The body of the paper does not include the title page, table of contents, appendix or references. Your paper should be high quality, free of spelling and grammatical errors, and of original work. Plagiarism will be dealt with harshly.
You are to title your paper by your last name. For example, my paper would be called “hunziker.doc” with “.doc” being the MS Word file extension.
You are to submit your paper by uploading it to your student folder in the course site prior to the due date.
For this assignment you:
1) Should submit your research paper to turnitin.com
2) Must submit your research paper to this assignment as a Word document.
Papers will be graded based on the Criminal Justice Paper Rubric found in your course site.
Quality of Response
No Response
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APAformat, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA most recent edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA,most recent edition, format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, punctuation, spelling errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform with size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.