I hired a super geek writer to help me finish a 10 week directed research course. We are now week 5, and my experience with my writer has been nothing short of a nightmare. I want to hire a new person to help me finish the course using the work I′ve presented so far and build on that.
I am behind schedule, so I need to finish the coursework in the next three weeks. The end result is an argumentative research paper.
The subject is the use of ketamine for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and PTSD. I have worked with some research to continue working with since I′ve already turned in five weeks of work. I need to continue with the same sources and line of argument. I can provide the outlines and past work to catch the rider up to speed.
I need a platinum writer skilled in writing argumentative research papers, putting sources in Turabian style, following instructions, and delivering on time. This is an undergraduate course, so the required work is not complicated. I need a good and creative writer and not someone who has to do 5 or 6 revisions and still not get it I also want a writer who will go the extra mile and not write the minimum amount of words but will write the maximum amount that I need. The final paper will be around 2600 words max; the weekly assignments are twice weekly, anywhere from 350 to 1500 words max. What remains is an introduction with a hook, a Section 1 argument, and a counterargument with two sources.
Section 2 with two solid arguments and counterargument and three separate supporting sources
A conclusion paper to wrap up the research paper, which could be around 4 to 500 words
Then, for the final paper, which is approximately 2200 to 2600 max words, there are weekly assignments, as I′ve said, breaking this all down into particular assignments.
2 assignments this week, 2 assignments next and 2 assignments the week after.
Author: admin
-
“Rescuing My Directed Research Course: Finding a Platinum Writer to Finish Strong on Ketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression and PTSD”
-
“Empowering and Inclusive Physical Education: Nurturing Physical Literacy in Diverse Learners” “Building Physical Literacy: A Critical Examination of Teaching Strategies and Their Impact on Students’ Academic, Social, and Emotional Development in Physically Active Disciplines” “Creating an Inclusive and Effective Physical Education Curriculum: My Personal Voice and Ambition”
Assignment Question – Reflecting on your
emerging values as a neophyte practitioner, how would you seek to support young
people’s physical literacy journeys through PE?
Your response should
consider:
1) The development of an inclusive, value-based
curriculum.
2) The pedagogies utilised to enhance learning and
engagement.
3) The outcomes that define success and how achievement
is assessed.
Your assignment can be
written in the first person and should reveal your ambition for physical
education based on theoretical knowledge and your applied experiences. Your
assignment should demonstrate critical thinking and be informed by independent
reading and research.
This essay must be UK based and relevant to The National
Curriculum for PE
Essay Outline: Supporting Young People’s Physical Literacy Journeys Through PE
Introduction
Define physical literacy and its importance in education.
State personal teaching philosophy and commitment to inclusive education.
Preview main points: curriculum development, effective pedagogies, and assessment of outcomes.
Body Paragraph 1: Development of an Inclusive, Value-Based Curriculum
Explain the concept of an inclusive curriculum in PE.
Discuss how to integrate values such as equity, respect, and empowerment into the PE curriculum.
Mention specific strategies to tailor PE programs to diverse learning needs and abilities.
Body Paragraph 2: Pedagogies Utilized to Enhance Learning and Engagement
Describe pedagogical approaches suitable for PE to foster engagement and learning.
Explore the use of technology, collaborative learning, and experiential learning in PE settings.
My personal experience –
During a challenging ten-month tenure as a full-time agency supply teacher in a secondary school located in a deprived area of Wales, I was entrusted with the responsibility of independently planning and leading physical education sessions for both GCSE groups and groups facing significant challenges. This role not only demanded adaptability and innovation in teaching practices but also a deep understanding of the socio-economic factors affecting student engagement in physical activities. I particularly focused on children who struggled with engagement in lessons, employing strategies informed by motivational theories such as Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). By creating an autonomy-supportive environment that provided choices within activities, I nurtured intrinsic motivation among the students. Additionally, I leveraged peer mentoring and scaffolded learning experiences tailored to individual capabilities, which helped students to gradually undertake more challenging tasks, thus maintaining their interest and participation. I designed my lessons to be inclusive and resourceful, making use of local amenities and low-cost equipment to ensure that financial constraints did not hinder student participation. My sessions aimed to promote not just physical competence but also vital life skills such as resilience, teamwork, and leadership, thereby reinforcing the role of physical education as a pivotal element of students’ overall educational experience. This period was instrumental in shaping my pedagogical strategies and highlighted the critical importance of adaptability and empathy in teaching, especially in environments with limited resources.
Provide examples from research and my personal experience that demonstrate successful pedagogies.
Don’t just describe the theories like Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD); critically analyze their applicability and limitations in the context of physical education. Discuss situations where these theories may be less effective and propose how they can be adapted or supplemented with other pedagogical strategies to meet the diverse needs of students in deprived areas.
Support all claims with robust evidence from scholarly sources. However, go beyond mere citation; critically engage with this evidence. Assess the methodologies of significant studies, discuss their findings, and compare different perspectives to show a deep understanding of the subject.
Reflect on your own experiences, but also critically evaluate them. Discuss what worked well and why, and more importantly, what didn’t work and how you adapted your approach. This reflection should show your ability to learn from practical experiences and apply these learnings to improve your teaching strategies.
When discussing the outcomes of your teaching methods, critically assess how effective they have been in improving physical literacy. Use specific examples and data where possible. Consider the broader impacts of these outcomes on students’ academic, social, and emotional development.
Address the ethical implications of teaching practices in physically active disciplines. Critically examine how your methods respect and promote the physical and psychological safety of students, particularly in settings with limited resources.
Demonstrate originality in your approach to solving problems or overcoming challenges. First-class work often includes innovative solutions that show clear thinking and creativity.
Ensure that your discussion acknowledges the broader socio-economic, cultural, and political contexts that impact physical education in deprived areas. This shows an ability to think globally about the role of education in society.
: Structure your essay to build a coherent and persuasive argument. Each paragraph should logically lead to the next, with clear transitions and without any redundant information. This clarity and focus are key indicators of first-class work.
Body Paragraph 3: Outcomes That Define Success and How Achievement Is Assessed
Define what success looks like in the context of physical literacy. Refer back to personal experinece to support points.
Discuss various assessment methods (formative, summative, peer-assessment) and their applicability in PE.
Reflect on the role of feedback and reflection in assessing students’ progress in physical literacy.
Conclusion
Summarize the key points discussed in the essay.
Reinforce the importance of a thoughtful, inclusive approach to teaching PE.
Conclude with a reflection on the potential impact of such an approach on future generations.
AIMS
Thorough Understanding and Integration of Theory: Your essay should show a deep understanding of the theories behind physical literacy, inclusive education, and effective pedagogies. Reference foundational theories and current research to underpin your arguments, showing how these theories directly inform your practice and teaching philosophy.
Critical Analysis and Reflection: A first-class essay typically includes critical analysis and reflection. This means going beyond describing what you would do, and critically analyzing why these choices are effective, discussing potential challenges, and how you might overcome them. Reflect on your personal experiences and theoretical learning to provide insightful evaluations and propose well-considered solutions.
Innovative and Practical Solutions: Demonstrate original thinking by proposing innovative approaches to PE that are not only based on theory but are also practical and applicable in real-world teaching environments. Highlight any unique ideas or adaptations you would implement in your teaching practice.
High-Quality, Academic Writing: The quality of your writing must be excellent, with clear, concise, and well-structured arguments. Use appropriate academic language, and meticulously proofread your work to avoid grammatical or spelling errors.
Extensive and Appropriate Use of Sources: With a requirement of 55 scholarly articles and books, ensure that your sources are not only numerous but also highly relevant and current. Properly integrate these sources into your text to support your claims, and meticulously follow the specified citation style to demonstrate academic rigor.
Comprehensive Coverage: Ensure that you comprehensively cover all aspects of the essay prompt, including development of an inclusive curriculum, pedagogical strategies, and assessment of outcomes. Each section should be balanced and thoroughly developed.
Personal Voice and Ambition: Since the assignment allows for writing in the first person, use this opportunity to express your personal teaching philosophy and professional ambition clearly and persuasively. Your passion for the subject and your commitment to the field of physical education should be evident throughout the essay.
Effective Organization and Flow: Organize your essay logically and ensure a smooth flow of ideas from one section to the next. Each paragraph should seamlessly lead into the next, maintaining a cohesive narrative throughout the essay.
I have attacthed an example below. -
Philosophy, Love, and Everyday Ethics: Exploring the Intersection of Love and Moral Principles
https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/10-philosophers-wh… ://www.cbc.ca/life/wellness/love-advice-from-… https://open.spotify.com/episode/6lm7QjjPhxF0D3MHZ… https://open.spotify.com/episode/3Ompn372P3zE7nVwE… Philosophy and love, did you think that this is a topic that philosophers thought about? Which of the philosophers in our reading do you agree with most regarding love? Explain why. Thinking about the Everyday Ethics podcasts, do you agree with their arguments regarding Valentine’s Day and marriage proposals? Is it time to make a change to those traditions? Can you find any part of those traditions that is unethical? Explain how some component of Valentine’s Day or marriage proposals might be unethical. Explain using one of the ethical theories you have learned in the course. For your blog you need to include at least two inline citations that show me you used course materials to get full credit for the assignment. This is your space to really ask me questions, discuss worries, bring up new ideas, tell me if you see a problem with the course and/or your peer groups. This is an incomplete/complete assignment, you just need to answer the questions and you will get credit. You can complete this assignment in a variety of ways. You can write this out. You can give a voice recording. You can make a video. Whatever way you are most comfortable with and what helps you get through the assignment easiest.
-
“The Limits of Reason: A Comparison of Descartes and Hume on Knowledge and its Boundaries in Causality, God, and Morality”
Compare Descartes and Hume on what can be known and how it can be known. In area after area, Hume is busy trying to convince us of the limitations of reason. Discuss how he goes about this with regard to causality, God, and morality.
-
“Uncovering the Flaws: A Forensic Psychologist’s Analysis of the Evidence in the Case of [Case Name]” Introduction: As a forensic psychologist, it is my duty to provide an objective analysis of the evidence presented in the case of
Write the brief from the perspective of a forensic psychologist using the psychological literature to highlight some of the flaws in the evidence provided (do not make legal arguments).
-
“Understanding Consumer Behavior: An In-Depth Interview with a Recent Product Purchaser”
The purpose of this exercise is to expand your understanding of consumer behavior by getting you face-to-face with a consumer. First, you need to find a person who is not a member of this course, and who has recently bought a product or service costing around $25 to $100. Second, you must conduct a depth interview of about 30-60 minutes in length with this consumer. Third, you must write a two-page report ( Arial 12, 1.5-line space) consisting of three sections. In the first portion of the report, summarize your interview. In the second portion, describe your insights based on the consumers’ responses. Third, describe the consumer behavior concepts learned in class that can be applied to this exercise. The goal of the interview is to understand the consumer’s buying, having, consuming, and disposing of this product or service in terms that can be useful to a marketing manager.
The list of questions is intended as a general guide around which you can build your in-depth interview. It is not to be followed rigidly. Nor do all questions apply to your case. Nor is it complete and exhaustive of the types of questions you need to ask, or the level of detail for which you need to explore. Rather you should try to stimulate a lively and open discussion around these key question areas from which you can: (a) develop a deep understanding why this person bought this product; what influenced her/his purchase; and (b) surface the factors, in the environment and in the customer’s psyche, that really determined why the customer acted the way s/he did.
General Areas of discussion
Who was the decision-making unit? • Who bought the product or service? • Identify all those who played a role in the decision process. What role did they play? What motivated the purchase? • What problems did the product/service solve? What functions would it facilitate? • What attributes seemed important? Characterize the decision. • Was it a first-time decision? A review of a previous decision? A careful decision? A casual decision? Was the amount of deliberation appropriate to the decision? Characterize the decision-making process. • What triggered the process? • Was there an information search? How was the search conducted? How much information was collected? What sources were used? When in the process was information gathered? • How many alternatives were evaluated? Why those? • How was the final choice determined? •Where did the consumer buy? • Why there? • Which came first: where to buy or what to buy? •When did you use/consume it? •Where did you use/consume it? • Did you consume it alone or with someone else? • How did you dispose of it? -
Title: “The Impact of Skipping Order Details on Customer Satisfaction in Online Shopping”
Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc) -
GUI4sher Project: Programmer Information Verification import tkinter as tk # Create a window window = tk.Tk() window.title(“GUI4sher Project: Programmer Information Verification”) # Function to check if all entries are correct def check_entries
Create a GUI4sher project with a Label, an Entry, another Label, another Entry, another Label, another Entry and a Button lined up vertically. If your project was not created with GUI4sher you will receive 0 for your assignment.
The first label says: N-Number:N00958491
The first entry starts out blank, it allows the user to type the N-number of the programmer (that’s you!).
The second label says: Last Name:
The second entry starts out blank, it allows the user to type the last name of the programmer (that’s you!).
The third label says: First Name:
The third entry starts out black, it allows the user to type the First Name of the programmer (that’s you!).
The button starts by saying: Check
When the button is pressed or when you hit return on any of the entries (the same thing happens):
if the first name is correct make the text in the First Name entry black otherwise, if it is incorrect, make the text in the First Name entry red
If the last name is correct make the text in the Last Name entry black otherwise make it red
If the N-number is correct make the text in the N-number entry black otherwise make it red.
If any of the entries (N-number, first name, last name) are wrong make the text of the button red and have the text of the button say “Fix the red words you typed” If they are all correct, make the text of the button black and the text of the button say “All Correct!”
Hitting the button and hitting enter on any of the entries does exactly the same thing