Author: admin

  • “The Power of Perception in Flannery O’Connor’s A Good Man is Hard to Find: An Argumentative Analysis”

    The final essay is a response to A Good Man is Hard to Find.  In the old days this is how argument was most often taught.  Students would read literature and make an argument about some element of the creative work.  This is what I want you to do.  This will involve some opinion you hold about the story.  But you opinion must be backed up by the text itself.
    However, that doesn’t mean no research.  You can provide voices that agree with you, expert voices.  Not peers or non-experts of literature. I want you to find one academic book are article at the library.  Seek journals.  I want 3 sources minimum. 
    Now, there are aspect of this story that you might be able to interview some one local.  Not a peer.  But as you read the story, and you see some aspect, ask me about who you might interview for that aspect. 
    As before, the essay must be written in third person.  Always.  It must be 1800 words minimum.  It must be in MLA form and MLA documentation.  You need a debatable argumentative thesis.  Nothing has changed from the other essays in terms of what I expect.

  • “Deserving of Scholarship: My Dedication to Hard Work and Community Involvement”

    Here is the beginning i need some words added on for why I am deserving of this scholarship 
    I believe that I deserve this scholarship because I am a very hard worker and an active member within my community. For as long as I remember I have been a member of the St. John the Evangelist Catholic Parish. I have attended many church services and religion classes throughout the years, and even participated in the youth choir. Outside of church I have participated in many clubs and extracurricular activities that have helped shape who I am today. Participating in these activities has helped me discover many character traits and values that I have.

  • Title: “From Divine Authority to Individual Freedom: An Ideological Trajectory through Pope, Wordsworth, and Tolstoy” The works of Alexander Pope, William Wordsworth, and Leo Tolstoy, though written in different time periods and

    Using three works we have explored before the novel, construct an ideological trajectory that gets us to where we are now.  What is the connection between Pope, Wordsworth, and Tolstoy, for example.  In 250 words, be as creative as you can be.

  • Title: “Building a Successful Kombucha Business: Lessons from Health-Ade’s Daina Trout” Introduction In the world of health and wellness, kombucha has become a popular beverage choice for its probiotic benefits and unique flavor.

    Listen to the podcast (its an hour long I WILL TIP VERY WELL FOR THIS)
    https://www.npr.org/2020/09/25/916944612/health-ade-kombucha-daina-trout
    3-5 pages, double spaced, first person allowed
    APA style
    What were the key components in Trout’s Business?
    What did they do poorly? What did they do well?
    You need 2 outside resources besides the podcast.
    What would you do differently? Be specific and use examples

  • “Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Policy Memo for Policy Makers” “Analyzing Evidence and Crafting Strategic Recommendations: A Memo on an Issue”

    Policy makers seldom have the time to delve through pages of literature on a specific policy question in debate. To make well informed decisions, they will rely on short and tightly written memos that can quickly and cogently relay the important policy facts, questions, and arguments about an issue. Your goal is to practice the art of memo writing for potential future policy endeavors. A policy memo, unlike a term paper or literature review, requires a different writing strategy. A policy memo must be tightly written, clearly organized, and advance a persuasive argument which flows in a logical and coherent manner. The author does not have time for a lengthy review of the literature. Flowery and elaborate writing will lose your audience’s interest. Instead, the author must focus on drafting a clear and concise memo that will present a persuasive argument that is substantiated with research evidence and advances a cogent analysis of the policy problem.In this course you will write 1 policy memo. Memo format provides for 3 single spaced pages (maximum), written in 12-point font. Each memo should reveal your thoughtful reading of course materials, including lectures, and discussions from seminar sessions.
    Use the following as a general guide for framing your memo:
    Begin with a brief overview and state the problem or objective in a clear thesis statement.
    Provide a conceptual framework, map your argument, and explicitly outline your thesis.
    Outline brief history or background relevant to the theme.
    Constructively analyze arguments, ideologies, and the quality of technical evidence.
    Advance your recommendations using evidence from literature and other sources to support your perspectives.
    Conclude with a persuasive argument and summary statement.
    The following is a description of the necessary elements and a suggested organizational format for a policy memo. There is no lock-step format formula for a policy memo. This is only a suggested format that in most cases will provide the framework for a clearly organized memo. However, the persuasive writing and specific content will still need to come from the author.
    INTRODUCTION
    – provide a brief introduction to the policy problem that you will write about
    …introduce the specific policy problem and place it in context of wider policy debate
    …hook the readers attention with a quick bit of evidence
    …evidence can also be mobilized to briefly articulate the problem
    – thesis statement
    …should clearly articulate your perspective/approach in analyzing the policy problem with a brief justification for why analysis is important
    – organizational/conceptual framework
    …for the purposes of the policy memo format, your conceptual frame will also work as your organizational framework
    …provide an organizational map/framework that signals to reader how your memo is organized AND introduces your analytical framework and rationale for analysis
    …briefly introduce the general thrust of your recommendations
    – expected outcome(s)
    …briefly outline the general expected outcome of your recs…this is a strategy for signaling your confidence in how your memo will persuade the reader…remember that the principle objective of your policy memo is PERSUASION THROUGH EFFECTIVE MOBILIZATION OF EVIDENCE!
    General Policy Memo Elements and Format
    –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
    A reader should take away from your introduction a VERY clear understanding of the elements contained in your memo and the reasons for addressing the specific policy problem: description of policy problem, thesis, description of recommendations,  expected outcome
    BACKGROUND
    -BRIEF literature review of the main issues linked to your chosen theme
    …present the wider policy problem as context for understanding the more detailed specifics problem you are writing about
    …be selective in reviewing the literature that is relevant to the perspectives you will introduce, there is no need to review the entire history of the issue
    …what is the extent of evidence and your own assessment of the quality of evidence? what patterns have emerged, and are there voids which may still be present? (this opens the door for you to present your own perspectives)
    …be analytical in your review of the literature…your presentation of major issues or specific evidence should be followed with a brief statement that articulates your own alternative interpretation
    …be strategic in the extent of evidence you present in your lit review and save the more salient or specific evidence to support your recommendations
    …signal how this literature is relevant to your recommendations, thus providing reader with hint of how your analysis will build on the literature
    …emerging recommendations…how does data/evidence inform the initial framing of your recommendations?
    RECOMMENDATIONS (aim for 3 RECs)
    – recommendations are the centerpiece of your memo…try and advance at least three separate recommendations (or one broad recommendation with 3 sub-themes).
    – state the REC in the header, thus saving space and boldly signaling to reader the main theme of your REC
    – provide detailed description of your REC (a thorough implementation plan is not necessary, but rather a clear description of the idea you are advancing…this might be done in one sentence or it may take several, depending on your theme)
    – evidence, evidence, evidence!!….mobilize evidence to support/bolster your REC and perspectives          
    …be careful in choosing evidence and be strategic in how you set-up the evidence in relation to your argument
    …if presenting counter evidence be critical and analytical in presenting shortcomings (be careful not to provide too much counter evidence that could refute your own perspectives)
    …avoid simple descriptive evidence, rather, use substantive evidence that assists you in activating the elements of your REC
    – provide justification/rationale for why your plan is important/feasible
    – always include a description of your intended outcome…what change will result if your REC is implemented?
    CONCLUSION
    – briefly restate your thesis followed by your main points
    – remind reader what you expect to change with your RECS
    – pack the final punch with a clear and persuasive closing statement
    OTHER ELEMENTS
    – begin with a traditional memo header (TO, FROM, DATE, RE) that describes who you are, the organization you are representing, as well as group to whom you are presenting (fictional or non-fictional figure).
    – use headers/sub- headers throughout in order to organize and divide sections of your memo… Be sure to and identify who you are…edit thoroughly, a poorly edited memo will interrupt the flow of your argument and weaken your memo’s effectiveness.

  • “The Controversy Surrounding Sha’Carri Richardson’s Elimination from the Olympics: Examining the Role of THC in Sports and Mental Health Prioritization”

    Chapter 15 covers, deviance, doping and violence in sport. Watch the attached video regarding Sha’carri Richardson’s elimination from the 2020 Olympics.  THC is a controversial drug as it seems to be non performance enhancing but yet still banned.  It is legal in several states in the US. Mental Health is a priority topic in athletics.  How do you feel about this decision?  This is your opinion but find sources and course materials that help you support your opinion. Paper must be at least 500 words and see rubic for information.
    The video is on youtube and it is NBC 
    today interview 
    Exclusive: Sha’Carri Richardson Speaks Out About Failed Drug Test

  • Contesting Citations: A Case Study from the OSHRC Introduction: The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) is an independent federal agency responsible for reviewing contested citations issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

    The OSHRC publishes decisions by administrative law judges and the full OSHRC on their website:
    Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. (n.d.). Decisions. https://www.oshrc.gov/decisions/
    Using the OSHRC Decisions Search, select “Final Commission Decisions” from the drop down menu. Then, use the date
    range to search and select one case within the last three years.
    After reading the case, write a paper that addresses the following areas that are listed below.
    Provide an introduction and a brief overview of the process for contesting citations.
    Include a summary of the company and the citation.
    Explain what the final decision of the OSHRC was in the case you selected, and whether or not you agree with this
    decision.
    Provide a rationale for your argument.
    Your paper should be a minimum of two pages. In addition to the case study you select from the OSHRC website, support
    your paper with at least one scholarly reference from the Waldorf Online Library.
    Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are

  • “Interpreting Guidelines for Academic Assignments”

    one of them is the guidelines and the seconf files is the example of how the professor wants us to interpret the questions and how she wants them written and ebverything PLEASE LOOK AT THE EXAMPLE

  • “El Santuario de Amor”

    Llegaron a la casa de Jin, y Taehyung no pudo evitar pasear la mirada por aquella habitación que ambos habían convertido en un santuario de amor. Las altas ventanas, pintadas de un blanco luminoso dónde se abrían hacia el pequeño patio, como si quisieran atrapar los rayos del sol y llevarlos al interior. Las cortinas de terciopelo color crema, pesadas y suaves al tacto, susurraban secretos de otras épocas…
    El corazón de Taehyung empezó a latir aún más deprisa. ¿Qué significaba aquel lugar para él? ¿Era solo un refugio de pasiones clandestinas o algo más profundo? Aquí, entre estas paredes, había sido amado y había amado como nunca antes.
    Miró a Jisoo, cuya presencia era como un delicado encaje en aquel escenario. Se suponía que ella era su mujer, su salvoconducto para moverse por el peligroso mundo de su amante. Pero, en ese instante, Taehyung se preguntó: Si yo no formaba parte de este lugar, ¿de cuál entonces? ¿Acaso existía un rincón en el mundo donde mi amor pudiera florecer sin restricciones?
    En la cocina, Jin cortaba el pan recién comprado en la panadería favorita de su hermana. El aroma cálido y reconfortante llenaba el espacio. Irina, silenciosamente, con su cigarrillo entre los dedos, servía la mesa con una delicadeza que parecía desafiar el tiempo.
    —Se les ve tan bien juntos —comentó Jin, su voz suave como la fresa que forma su boca—. Tan normales, tan felices. ¿Qué tal les va?
    Jisoo sonrió, y antes de que Taehyung pudiera responder, Irina lo hizo por ellos:
    —Como siempre, Seokjinnie. No es necesario hacer preguntas tontas.
    Jisoo, con un trozo de pan en la mano, miró a Irina con complicidad.
    —Oh, qué pesada eres, Nina. ¿No ves que a Jin no le hemos dicho nada? —dijo, y Taehyung sintió que el aire se volvía más denso.
    Jin arqueó las cejas, su mirada penetrante se posó en Taehyung.
    —¿Qué no me han dicho? —preguntó, y Taehyung tragó saliva.
    —Nos iremos de Nueva York —intervino Jisoo, su voz llena de alegría—. Estábamos pensando en Seattle, o en algún lugar donde la elegancia no se funda con la melancolía que vivíamos en la casa de California.
    —Seattle…
    —Sí. Seattle —repitió Taehyung, estremecido. 
    Jisoo apoyó la cabeza en su brazo, y en el silencio que siguió, Irina se levantó y se marchó al baño de arriba murmurando algo para ella sola. Pero Taehyung no podía apartar la mirada de Jin, cuyos ojos parecían leer su alma. ¿Qué significaba aquel cambio de rumbo? ¿Para qué? ¡Jisoo necesita ser atendida inmediatamente!

  • “Exploring the Depths: A Portfolio of Creative Writing” Title Page: “Exploring the Depths: A Portfolio of Creative Writing” By [Your Name] Preface: Throughout this semester, I have had the opportunity to explore my creativity and develop

    Please assemble FIVE pieces of writing from this class and arrange them in a portfolio with a TITLE that refers to the entire grouping. TWO of the pieces must present (1) the original draft you submitted; (2) a self-evaluation of the draft and how you would revise it to improve it; (3) the final revision of the draft. Follow the guidelines here for your revision process https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/CC3BFEEB-C364-E1A1-A5390F221AC0FD2D/creative_writing_revision_strategies_gg_final.pdfLinks to an external site.
    Please include a PREFACE that explains why you chose the pieces you did (50 words minimum). Please also include an AFTERWORD describing what this semester of creative writing did for you, what it meant to you, and what you hope to carry forward. (50 words minimum). 
    Please submit the portfolio on the due date indicated here.
    CREATIVE WRITING: FINAL PORTFOLIO
    (1) Title Page
    (2) Preface 
    (3) FIVE  pieces you wrote for the class
    (4) TWO of these five pieces you wrote for the class must include: (i) the original draft; (ii) a self-evaluation on revision possibilities, and what you might you might change in a second iteration; (iii) and a revised draft .
    (5) Afterword
    Also create two rough drafts for two of the provided links below …