The instructions and how the paper needs to be written is in the file below.
I am an Asian American. I am needing this to be written from that point a view because this is a reflective writing.
here are the links that the writing will be about:
– https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
– https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88478467
Author: admin
-
Title: Reflecting on the Impact of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” Speech on Asian Americans
-
“The Evolution of Policing: Navigating the Future of Law Enforcement”
Students are required to choose one of the topics provided by the instructor or they can come up with an interesting topic of current events and then obtain approval from the instructor. It can be a recent hot topic that attracted public scrutiny and is covered by the mass media. The paper should provide solutions to an investigated problem and should be based on research findings. It should make connections to the course content and reflect a student’s reaction. The final paper must be professionally written of 4 to 5 double-spaced pages (12-point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins) excluding references. This paper must include at least two outside (different from assigned readings) sources cited in the proper APA (American Psychological Association) format. One of these two outside sources must be a book or an academic peer-reviewed journal (e.g. Policing & Society, Police Quarterly, Justice Quarterly, Criminology & Public Policy, Police Practice & Research, International Journal of Police Science & Management, and Police Studies). Merely web sources will not be sufficient. Students will be required to attach a bibliography of used sources at the end of the paper in APA style. The final paper will be graded based on accuracy, organization, coherence, a reflection of analytical thinking, individual reactions, and proper citation in accordance with APA style. The topic that I chose for this paper is “The Future Of Policing”
-
“Lessons Learned: Reflections on Internship/Job Experience in Healthcare”
Create a slide presentation that describes lessons learned
through your experiences as an intern, employee in healthcare (for students
receiving waivers only), or following completion of your project based learning
experience. All presentations must
follow the format outlined below.
Presentation Content:
Slide: Title of
Presentation (Students can select title they feel is most appropriate). Include date, student’s first and last name, name of organization or
employer. Not applicable for
project-based learning.
Slide: List objectives of presentation (maximum 3)
Slide: Photo of internship supervisor, job supervisor, or
professional colleague/or mentor for those who completed project-based
learning. Include a 3-5 sentence bio that
includes individual’s name, title, primary role in organization/institution, years
of service in the organization
or career field, and degrees, certifications,
etc.
Slide(s): Three maximum. Describe a special project or
responsibilities completed during your internship, employment in healthcare
(those who received waivers), or as part of your project-based learning. You may also include lessons learned about
health administration, management, health care and/or community/population
health during your experience.
When describing projects or tasks completed, include the
following points:
1.
Purpose or overall description of the project.
2.
Steps used to complete the project.
3.
Summary of any results gathered.
4.
Summarize what you learned in the classroom that
was observed, experienced, or that can be applied to your internship/or job.
If your presentation focuses on lessons learned about health
administration, heath care, management and/or community/population health ,
follow these guidelines:
1.
Summarize what you learned in the classroom that
was observed or experienced during your internship/or job and/or lessons about
professional development.
2.
List networking opportunities (i.e., meetings,
conferences, etc.) and/or professional contacts made during the internship/or
job. -
“The Impact of Forensics on the Judicial Process: A Case Study of Alice Sebold and the Man Wrongfully Accused of Her Rape”
Instructions
Guidelines: please use the points below to organize your investigation and final paper (report/essay).
Title Page – the paper should have a title page (see sample)
Body of the Paper
Introduction Section
a) Based on the recurring theme you selected from the New Yorker article, “Alice Sebold and the Man Wrongfully Accused of Her Rape,”
Link to article please read: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/05/29/the-tortured-bond-of-alice-sebold-and-the-man-wrongfully-convicted-of-her-rape
provide a summary of the case and specific examples and instances/context in the article that highlight your theme.
Analysis Section
b) Find at least two peer reviewed articles that provides a general background or basic information on your theme (forensics).
c) Based on your theme(forensics), evaluate/judge (cause and effect) how your theme unfolded throughout the judicial process. Was justice served, or led to the truth, or undermined?
Conclusion Section:
d) What is your personal take on the entire case (from arrest to incarceration, parole and release)? What went wrong? Any recommendations to fix it?
Works Cited Section
e) References
Note: double space, 12-point font, and 3 – 5 pages long. The title page shoud not be numbered. APA style. -
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Forensic Psychology: The Military and Alternative Justice Systems
Hello Everyone,
Starting this weeks discussion, I chose to talk about ethical issues that forensic psychology professionals are likely to encounter while working with the military or the emergence of an alternative to criminal court. The military justice system is unique from the civilian criminal justice system, and forensic psychologists working in this context must navigate various ethical dilemmas. One such issue is the potential for conflicts of interest, as military psychologists may be asked to provide services that could benefit both the military and the accused service member (American Psychological Association, 2013). For instance, a military psychologist might be asked to evaluate a service member’s mental health status for both treatment purposes and to determine their fitness for duty or potential discharge. This dual role can create ethical concerns regarding confidentiality, impartiality, and objectivity.
Autonomy refers to the right of individuals to make their own decisions about their healthcare and participation in research studies. In clinical trials, autonomy can be compromised when participants are not fully informed about the study, its risks, and benefits, leading to a lack of genuine consent. Justice in research involves fairness in participant selection, distribution of benefits and burdens, and access to research opportunities. Violations of justice occur when vulnerable populations are disproportionately targeted for research participation without adequate protection or when there is unequal access to the benefits of research outcomes. Confidentiality is essential for protecting participants’ privacy and maintaining trust in research relationships. Breaches of confidentiality can lead to harm by exposing sensitive information without consent, undermining participant trust in the research process.
Ethical dilemmas can be complex and challenging situations that require careful consideration and thoughtful decision-making. When faced with an ethical dilemma, it is important to approach the situation with a clear understanding of the values and principles at stake. Ethical dilemmas can be complex and challenging situations that require careful consideration and thoughtful decision-making. When faced with an ethical dilemma, it is important to approach the situation with a clear understanding of the values and principles at stake. Once all relevant information has been gathered and stakeholders’ perspectives have been considered, it is time to evaluate the available options for resolving the ethical dilemma. Each option should be carefully assessed based on its alignment with ethical principles, potential consequences, and impact on stakeholders.
Cameron Ritchie, E., & Golden, E. (n.d.). Forensic and ethical issues in military behavioral health. In US Army, Forensic and Ethical Issues in Military Behavioral Health. https://medcoeckapwstorprd01.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/pfw-images/dbimages/Forensic%20Psych%20Ch%2001.pdf -
“Final Research Design Paper: Incorporating Feedback and Revisions from Previous Assignments” “Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: A Critical Analysis”
The asignment despcription is: This is when your progressive assignments will come into play in finishing your research final paper (NOT A ROUGH DRAFT, It is your research design paper): You will be assembling the answers (including the revised feedbacks and comments I suggested to be incorporated into your answers) from Hw2: question 1 involving the research question goes at the beginning of literature review, questions 2 and 3 into the theory and hypothesis section, questions 4-10 goes into the Analysis section, and question 11 goes into either the beginning of literature review before research question and/or conclusion. From hw 3 involving the literature review will go in the literature review section while references go at the end of the design under references page(s). As of course, you be making revisions and changes, and expansions or additions in accordance to my feedbacks and suggestions from those previous submissions.
For Final Research Design Paper, make sure all pages have headers such as either your last name or title name and page number. Do not forget to write course section and number…
Make sure the overall format is 1-inch margin all around and 12-point font in Times New Roman Style. In addition, remember this is a formal Paper, so avoid I, My, Mine, etc wordings, … in the first half of the paper (literature review, and theory/hypothesis sections). Instead, write in third person format such as They, He, she..this paper proposes, and so on…also in the literature review, cite and cite-especially when mention they/he/she/study/researchers/writers/etc.. cite in parenthesis.. all authors!… and anytime mentioning quotes-do not forget the page number(s)
Avoid using abbreviated terminology such as can’t or don’t, instead spell or write them out like do not or cannot; again, this is a formal paper.
Again, I am repeating this-Make sure to cite sources often in the literature review, do not just put he or she, they, the study or research found/wrote without citations because you are dealing with multiple sources within sentences body/paragraphs…. (always cite within the sentence body or cite at the end of sentence with authors’ last names..year of publication, {and page number if quoting})…
If citing an author(s) for the first time in sentence body, cite full names and ALL OF THEM if dealing with multiple authors along with year of publication..afterwards/subsequently cite last names of all authors and year of publication…
USE quotes sparingly (LITTLE AS POSSIBLE, like less than 3 quotes per page, and do not make them long).. rather I prefer you to paraphrase in your own words what the author(s) conveying and cite them in parenthetical citations or in body sentence.. remember it is best to cite often within a Literature review section even if repeatedly mentioning them!
See Sample paper attached below to use as a visual blueprint guide on how to construct/complete final paper from beginning to end including format style (apa/apsa).. and there is an additional source to offer further info if needed.. but the sample paper will be your best guide for this final paper submission (*keep in mind that the length of the literature review section in the sample paper is a bit short, but make sure your final paper’s literature review section is 5 pages or over in length)
Copy/paste answers and modify/extend etc according to my suggested comments and feedback’s from your graded hw 2 and 3.. For example, from hw 2, questions 1 and 11 will go at beginning of literature review section. From hw 2, questions 2 and 3 are theory and hypothesis that goes into the theory/hypothesis section of final paper (assignment 4). From hw 2, questions 4-10 will go into the analysis section of hw 4 (final paper while also including a second hypothesis of the control maybe, mention what kind of statistical regression would like to run, although you will not be running any experiments/will not be any interpretation of data, follow the analysis section from the official sample paper…). From hw 3, the literature review goes in the literature review section as have to modify in essay style if haven’t done so and the references go at the end under references page in final paper (hw 4).
The Conclusion section will be a short summary of expectations , disappointments, what you learned, or hoped will happen in the future etc..
FINAL PAPER’S Chronological ORDERING: cover title page, literature Review subheading/section (5 pages min length REQUIRED for this section and must use scholarly sources), Theory/Hypothesis subheading/section (.5-1 page), analysis subheading/section (.5-1 page), Conclusion subheading/section (.5-1 page), and References page (8 min. scholarly sources put in alphabetical ordering and in APA/APSA format). Overall total length of final paper could range from 7 or more pages
I have attatched examples, as well as sources that I have already gathered that must be used. -
Title: Lessons Learned from Hurricane Harvey: Improving Planning Measures for Future Disasters Introduction: Natural disasters have the potential to cause devastating effects on communities, infrastructure, and economies. In the past 20 years, Hurricane Harvey has been one of
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Postincident review allows emergency managers, first responders, and allied professionals the opportunity to learn from past mistakes and reinforce positive adaptive behaviors. In the past decade, there have been many disasters where the effects of the hazard impact were exacerbated by either the failure or lack of adequate planning methods.
Select one natural, technological, or human-caused disaster that has occurred in the past 20 years.
Hurricane Harvey is the selected natural disaster
write a 1,000-1,250 word essay that includes the following:
Briefly describe the disaster event.
Discuss the failure of or lack of effective planning measures.
Provide a summary of after-action lessons learned from this event.
In your viewpoint, recommend how specific planning measure would prevent future planning failures to limit losses and ensure continuity of operations. Cite relevant emergency management sources to defend your claims
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Requirements: 1,000-1,250 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph. -
“The Legal Landscape of Cybersecurity: A Review of Successful and Unsuccessful Litigation Cases”
Do a reserach paper on cybersecuirty litigation, including evidence of lawsuits that have went in the plaintiffs favor and lawsuits that have went in the defendants favor. I will have to submit this into turnitin, so please no plagirsm.
-
“The Tragic Consequences of Impulsive Actions in Romeo and Juliet Act 3 Scene 1” Introduction: William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet is a timeless tale of love, tragedy, and the consequences of impulsive actions. Act
Argumentative writing for R&J play Act 3 scene 1. Use attached Formative writing guide for detailed instructions.
Romeo and Juliet play –
MyRomeo&Juliet – online version of the full text with glossary and explanatory annotations, as well as resources like videos and recordings of the text.
Audiobook
Online Summaries
Shmoop
Sparknotes
No Fear “translation” – this is a resource from Sparknotes that has the text of the play beside a “modern translation” of the text. Note that the “translation” sometimes leaves out nuance.
Graphic novel – also from Sparknotes, does not contain all of the text but does have good visuals
Below Shakespeare vocabulary guide has definitions for some of the most common words you’ll see in the play (ex: anon)
Resources to use-
Romeo and Juliet play –
MyRomeo&Juliet – online version of the full text with glossary and explanatory annotations, as well as resources like videos and recordings of the text.
Audiobook
Online Summaries
Shmoop
Sparknotes
No Fear “translation” – this is a resource from Sparknotes that has the text of the play beside a “modern translation” of the text. Note that the “translation” sometimes leaves out nuance.
Graphic novel – also from Sparknotes, does not contain all of the text but does have good visuals
Below Shakespeare vocabulary guide has definitions for some of the most common words you’ll see in the play (ex: anon) -
Title: The Impact of Bourbon Reforms and Colonial Dynamics on the Spanish Empire
Each essay response should include a thesis (with different subtopics) supported by a plethora of evidence from multiple slides(uploaded). Make sure to only include arguments, ideas, and terms covered in course lectures and readings. You should NOT include any information drawn from outside sources found either online or in print. Essay responses that draw from other sources will receive a zero for that part of the exam.
Section One (500 words each):
“The Bourbon monarchs and their reformers enhanced the wealth, power, and prestige of the Spanish empire during the 18th century.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why or why not? In your response, be sure to address both the positive and negative outcomes of their policies.
How did the territorial, economic, and military expansion of European rivals impact the Spanish empire during the Bourbon period?
Section Two (750 words each):
How did indigenous resistance, negotiation, and collaboration shape the boundaries of colonial authority over the course of the Spanish imperial period (1492-1898)?
In your opinion, which of the following three (race, gender, or class) was most important for the development of Spanish colonial societies? Keep in mind that there are numerous ways to approach this question. While you may choose to focus on one or more themes, be sure to discuss the agency and contributions of both colonial officials and subjects (castas, women, etc.).