Need final draft of
Imagine a world where the color of your skin dictates your opportunities, your access to resources, even your very safety. This isn’t a dystopian novel; it’s the lived reality for millions grappling with the pervasive effects of systemic racism. While individual acts of racism – like a racial slur, discriminatory hiring practices, or even violence – are undeniably harmful and must be addressed, researchers and social commentators argue that it’s the invisible systems of oppression, deeply woven into the fabric of society, that demand our urgent attention (Feagin, 2010). These systems, often disguised within seemingly neutral policies and institutions, perpetuate racial inequality in ways that are often subtle and difficult to detect, yet have a profound impact on the lives of marginalized groups.
Think of it like this: racism is like a virus, and systemic racism is the pandemic. We can treat individual symptoms – addressing a hateful comment here, a biased policy there – but until we address the underlying disease, true healing and lasting change remain elusive. Sociologist Joe Feagin, in his powerful book “Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations,” shines a light on this very issue. He argues that systemic racism isn’t about isolated incidents; it’s about a system rigged to benefit some while actively disadvantaging others based solely on race (Feagin, 2010).
Imagine a society where your race unfairly determines your access to quality education, affordable healthcare, or even fair treatment by the justice system. This is the stark reality Feagin (2010) paints, meticulously tracing the historical roots of systemic racism from slavery and Jim Crow to the present day. He provides compelling evidence of how these historical injustices continue to shape contemporary society, manifesting in issues like mass incarceration, wealth disparities, and healthcare inequities. He doesn’t just expose the problem; he challenges us to confront the uncomfortable truth that “racist beliefs and stereotypes are often unconsciously ingrained in our societal norms and individual biases” (Feagin, 2010, p. 23). These biases, often implicit and unintentional, seep into our institutions and interactions, perpetuating a cycle of disadvantage for people of color. Feagin’s work is a call to action, urging us to acknowledge the deeply entrenched nature of systemic racism and to actively dismantle these systems of oppression brick by painful brick.
Author: admin
-
“Unmasking Systemic Racism: Confronting the Pandemic of Inequality”
-
Title: “Maximizing the Potential of Multicultural Teams: Strategies for Effective Management and Global Leadership”
mgt 385
Multi-cultural Teams
First, read “How to Best Lead a Multicultural or International Team” by Adam Uzialko in Business News Daily at https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/9924-lead-multicultural-international-team.html
Second, watch What Makes a Global Leader? on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pMGJ9KJvBU (5 min).
After reading Chapter 15 and the materials above, please address the following questions:
Can you think of some benefits of having a multicultural team? Do you think these benefits outweigh any drawbacks?
What are some of the best strategies for managing an international team?
What role does culture play in motivation? How might a manager be sensitive to this?
What skills are important to be an effective global leader?
How can adopting a global mind-set lead to a strategic advantage for an organization? -
“Improving Breast Cancer Prevention: Implementing Automatic BRCA Analysis for High-Risk Individuals”
The purpose of the Policy Brief is to succinctly evaluate policy options regarding a specific health care delivery issue to advocate for intervention(s) at the systems level. This Policy Brief will include actionable recommendations to an existing health policy to positively impact healthcare. Recommendation will be informed by a literature review of the recently published (within last 5 years) scholarly evidence available on the subject. The topic I want to discuss in this policy brief paper is the BRCA analysis test.
I believe there should be an automatic BRCA analysis for individuals with a history of breast cancer in their family by age 30, along with existing diagnostic testing. -
Peer Review: Comparing and Contrasting Two Student Articles on Climate Change Student 1: In the first article, “The Impact of Climate Change on Global Health,” the author discusses the various ways in which climate change is affecting human health on
Hello, attached are two separate articles that have been completed by two different students. you will have to read both articles and write two separate paragraph more or less, with in text citations and at least one reference for each of the two articles. you are doing a peer review . this is a discussion post. submission instructions: You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
this is due by06/21/2024 by 11pm EST -
“The Treaty of New Echota: A Symbol of Injustice and American Expansionism” “Overcoming Research Limitations: A Working Annotated Bibliography in Chicago Style”
Thesis: The Treaty of New Echota, signed in 1835, epitomizes the profound injustices suffered by the Cherokee Nation, as it led to their forced removal and the devastating Trail of Tears trek from their land. The circumstances surrounding the treaty’s signing highlight the harsh realities of American expansionist policies, including coercion, manipulation, and the disregard for Native American sovereignty and rights.
Be sure to use Times New Roman 12 pt., double space, number your pages, adhere to the Chicago Style Guide, and run a Grammar/Spell check before submitting. Note, the title page does not receive a page number. Be sure to include the subject headings listed in the HIST300 Research Proposal Guidelines. The suggested length for each section is included in the descriptions.
The proposal will contain the following elements:
TITLE PAGE
SECTION 1
WORKING TITLE
INTRODUCTION
WORKING THESIS STATEMENT
SECTION 2
RESEARCH BACKGROUND
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
SECTION 3
RESEARCH METHODS
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
SECTION 4
WORKING ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
TITLE PAGE
Each proposal should have a title page that is formatted as per the “Turabian Student Paper-Formatting Tip Sheets” https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/Student-Tip-Sheets.html
An example can be found at https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/dam/jcr:b7955915-8c3c-499f-a250-a6f03114c98c/Turabian-Tip-Sheet-2.pdf .
The first section should be no longer than 2 pages double-spaced.
WORKING TITLE
What is your current working title for the project? The title should be specific and clear. Ideally, it should summarize the research problem with efficiency and style. Avoid titles that are pretentious, vague, or wordy. Expressions such as “An Investigation of” are redundant and should be omitted. Titles of just one or two words, on the other hand, are too brief to indicate the scope of the research problem.
Here are some examples of poorly worded titles that were effectively revised:
Original: “An Investigation of the Possibility of improving the Tax Method of Many Massachusetts Cities and Towns for Raising Revenue to Cover Rising Expenses for Public School Education in Those Same Cities and Towns” (Too wordy)
Revised: “Improving Education Funding through Local Tax Revenues in Five Massachusetts Municipalities”
Original: “The Need for World Order” (Too vague)
Revised: “The Peace-Keeping Role of the United Nations in Lebanon since 1980”
INTRODUCTION
Include a brief overview of your topic. Build on your contributions from the Week 2 discussion and your submission about your research topic made during Week 3. By now, you should have refined and clarified your topic several times and should be able to provide a clear and concise overview.
WORKING THESIS STATEMENT
SECTION 2
The second section should be no longer than 2 pages double-spaced.
RESEARCH BACKGROUND
Explain why your topic is worth researching. Discuss the historiography – What are the important articles and books on your topic? How will your work challenge or complement those works? What subdisciplines of history does your topic connect to? Think of our Week 2 discussion of subdisciplines, and our Week 3 and Week 6 discussions about historiography.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
List at least 3-5 research questions that you want to explore. If you have more, that is fine. Be as specific as possible.
SECTION 3
The third section will likely be only one page double spaced. It should be no longer than 2 pages double-spaced.
RESEARCH METHODS
What is your plan for conducting the research? Beyond your discussion of the historiography, what other key secondary sources have you identified? Why are they important to your topic? What archives will you conduct research in? What types of primary sources will you use? During our Week 3 discussion, we identified and discussed potential archives. By now you should have a clear idea of the archives that you want to use. Include a discussion of at least 3potential archives and how you will access the material located there.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
Plan ahead for potential obstacles in your research. Will you need to order books or journal articles? Are there secondary sources that you need to have the library acquire for you? Are you able to access all the journal articles that you want to use? Are there primary sources that you need to order from archives? Will you need to visit any archives in person?
SECTION 4
After the Week 3 and Week 4 assignments, you should have a good sense of how long your annotations should be as well as how to properly format the annotated bibliography, as per the Chicago Style Guide.
WORKING ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
You should include at least 20 sources with annotations (7 primary sources and 13 secondary sources). Chicago style. Notes bibliography standard only! -
Title: Ethical, Spiritual, and Cultural Considerations in Manmade Disasters: The Role of a Community Health Nurse and the Importance of Integrating a Christian Worldview
Identify potential ethical and spiritual considerations and cultural practices that could arise for individuals, communities, and health care providers in the event of a manmade disaster. Describe the significance of a community health nurse’s role in integrating Christian worldview in caring for individuals, community, self, and colleagues during disaster management. Identify one resource available to support self-care management for individuals.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. -
“Endurance and Leadership: An Analysis of Ernest Shackleton’s Extraordinary Journey”
You will write and present a paper analyzing one of the following historic figures: Ernest Shackleton, President Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Dietrich Bonhoeffer or Rachel Carson
-
“Exploring the Intersection of Race and Education: Thoughts and Questions” After reading the assigned readings for this week on the topic of race and education, I found the issues surrounding access and equity particularly interesting. The article by Ladson-Billings
Students should post their thoughts and questions to help stimulate discussion. What issues were most interesting? What was confusing? What issues or topics do you want to discuss further? After the first week, can you connect or contextualize this week’s readings with previous weeks’?
Post a minimum of 150 words commenting on, analyzing, or questioning the readings on the weekly topic. How can you connect or contextualize this week’s readings with previous weeks’ readings, the live class handouts, or other parts of the module? -
Title: “Enhancing Employee Training: A Digital Asset for the New Training Program”
For this project, you may develop a video, interactive, animation, infographic, or other product that is not primarily text-based. The message should explain some element or elements of the training program. Some technology tools to consider are PowerPoint, Canva, Screencast-o-matic, Adobe Express or, if you have an iPhone or iPad, Apple Clips or Keynote. You can find support materials for using these tools in the recommended resources for this week. It is also acceptable to use tools not listed here. Exactly what you do for this assignment will vary depending on your goal and tool.
Your plan should include
A short essay detailing where the digital asset you create fits into the larger plan. It is acceptable to include copied content from your Week 3 paper for this part of the paper.
Talk about your process and experience in creating your digital asset, including identification of the tool or tools you used to create it.
The text content you submit should be the equivalent of a 1-to-2-page paper.
As a reminder, here are the details of this program:
The training is required and will take place quarterly.
During the other eight months of the year, all employees must complete one training credit per month from a selection of full- and half-credit training options. Full-credit trainings will take about four hours to complete, and half-credit trainings will take about two hours.
This new policy takes effect in the next quarter, and the first training covers the training program itself. A website listing available trainings will be available at the beginning of the upcoming quarter. (You can use the URL abccorp.com/trainings in your paper if you like, but this is not a working link.)
Interested employees can propose trainings that they will design and present, for which they can also receive training credit. A full credit is given for the initial design and presentation, and a half-credit will be given each additional time the training is presented. Employee-designed trainings may not be offered more than once per quarter. The link to propose a training is at the bottom of the training catalog website. -
“Estimating the Cost of Capital for an International Acquisition: A Comparative Analysis of Two Countries”
In
this assignment you are asked to estimate the adjustments a MNE would make to
its cost of capital for an acquisition in the countries and currencies you have
chosen to work on. There are several approaches to estimating the cost of
capital in overseas markets. In the appendix entitled “Supplement on
Emerging Market Discount Rates” four are summarized. For this assignment
we will rely upon a simpler approach that emphasizes the spread (or difference)
between the cost of sovereign debt in the U.S. and the cost of sovereign debt
in your chosen countries.
First,
as eview and using our textbook’s notation, recall from Chapter13, the
traditional equation for the weighted average cost of capital (kWACC):
kWACC = kE+kV (1-t)DdV
Where:
ke=
cost of equity
kd=before-tax
cost of debt t = marginal tax rate
E=market
value of the firm’s equity D = market value of the firm’s debt
V=
market value of the firm’s securities (E + D)
Commonly
the cost of equity (ke) is determined using the Capital Asset Pricing
Model(CAPM) defined as:
Ke = Cost of Equity = krf+�m(km-krf) where:
Ke =
expected (required) rate of return on equity
kr
f= rate of interest on risk-free bonds (Treasury bonds, for example)
�m = coefficient of systematic risk for
the firm (beta)
km = expected (required) rate of return on the
market portfolio of stocks According to R. Hacker (using different notation):
The
problem in this formula is in determining Rm, expected return on the equity
market, and ke (equity beta). Many countries have small publicly
traded equity markets or stocks have very small daily or annual trading
volumes. Such a shortage of reliable data makes the determination of R may be
questionable.
[An
alternative to the traditional CAPM formula is proposed]:
Cost of Equity =Rd+(Rmu – Rfu) + (Rfx-Rfu) where:
Rd=
cost of debt of the acquired company
Rmu =Expected return on the equity market in the U.S.
Rfu= Expected risk free rate in the U.S.
(Rm-
Rfu is the premium for equity risk in the U.S.)
Rfx=
Expected risk free rate in the country of the
acquisition
(Rfx-Rfu
is the country risk premium (based on the difference in yield for sovereign bonds)
The advantage of this formula is that almost every company
anywhere in the world has a cost of debt and debt cost is almost always a free
market determination. To the cost of debt what the formula does is add the
premium for equity in the U.S. plus a country risk premium, which adjusts the
U.S. equity premium upward to consider country risk.
[I]f the foreign country has no sovereign debt. I would
reconsider the acquisition because the country is very undeveloped, and it
might be less capital at risk to build a company from scratch. If you still
want to do an acquisition, I would use the interest rate of the largest company
in the country that has issued public or private debt as a surrogate for
sovereign debt. The government should have a lower cost of debt than a private
company but this company’s cost of debt is an objective number and a bit conservative
(which is not a bad thing in a foreign acquisition).
Source:http://sophisticatedfinance.typepad.com/sophisticated_finance/2013/08/calculating-international-cost-of-capital.html
Following
this approach you are asked to determine the cost of equity for an acquisition
in both of your chosen countries and currencies using the following formula:
Ke = Cost of Equity = kd + (kUSmkt-kUSrf)
+ (kForeignSovDebt-kUSrf )
where
kd= kForeignSovDebt+2%
kUSmkt=
Expected return on the S&P500
kUSrf
= Current yield on 10-yearU.S.Treasury’s
kForeignSovDebt =
Current yield on10-year sovereign debt in your chosen country